« September 2003 | Main | November 2003 »

New blog software

So until today I've been using a custom blog created by yours truly. Something I was quite proud of, and it was quite functional.

[warning: nerd talk]
It was a good excersize in creating a winforms application talking a web service, being retrieved by an asp.net page. Quite cool really.
[end warning]

But now I've jumped ship and gotten a TypePad blog (this here that you are looking at). It has quite a few new features and bells and whistles. Very exciting from my end, sort of the same on your end with the addition of the following that we didn't have before.

Comments (feel free to comment)
Trackback (if you don't know what it is, don't worry)
Dynamic archives (meaning it just does it all for me, very nice)
Recent post listing.

So... enjoy.

If you want a hand getting your own blog set up, let me know.

P.S. I haven't finished some of the archive page layouts, nor have I looked through all the older posts to make sure they imported ok. Your patience is requested.

Email marketing - double edged sword

Permission based email vs. spam. A new study find that email marketing can help or hurt greatly.

Email can be a highly effective channel for driving revenues, developing customer relationships and creating brand-experience differentiation. At the same time, however, poor email practices can train customers not only to ignore an offending company in the channel, entailing a high opportunity cost of lost revenues, but nearly half of consumers surveyed reported that they have stopped doing business with companies altogether as a result of poor email practices. Thus, sending "just one more email" is a double-edged sword: it may yield an additional sale, or it might drive a customer away forever.

Having a strong email based relationship with your customers is indisputably one of the very best marketing tools available to you as a business. (And I would argue that it is the very best tool you have). But in a world where web users have become much more savvy and much more averse to spam - email communication can also be a double edged sword.

Spam is a sticky topic. No one wants to admit they engage in it, particularly to their own customers. Most companies are scared to be accused of it. The real spammers are finding it increasingly difficult to do it. All of us hate to get it.

And with the flood of fierce opposition to spam both from the spam watchdog community, and from legislatures in the wake of the wildly popular do-not-call list, it has become clear that playing with commercial email, is playing with fire.

So what is the message here for companies who have "legitimately" acquired an email address from a trusting customer?

The real message is this: abuse that trust, and lose a customer forever. You walk a fine line as a business, and if you cross that line, you've lost a customer, and the revenue that customer might have provided down the road. And of course that means revenue from both them, and anyone they may have referred to you.

Customers stop doing business with companies that have poor email practices.
nearly half of consumers surveyed reported that they have stopped doing business with companies altogether as a result of poor email practices.

So if you perturb a customer by spamming them, they are likely to reject you and your brand wholesale.

This makes sense intuitively. Just like we don't want to waste time sifting through offers for Via*ra, mortgages, debt reduction and Russian brides - our customers don't want to waste time sifting through our spam.

But what about well done email marketing? This may be difficult to define (and if so, drop me a note and let's talk about it), but this study also found this:
Similarly the study finds that over 57% of consumers have made purchases as a result of email.

So engage in email marketing very, very carefully.

A good rule of thumb for content: Pretend that the email you are sending is actually you, as a salesperson, approaching this customer as they just walked through your door. Would you assault your customer with half-truths, empty promises, a long rolling hyped up sales pitch? Make your email content as respectful as you would be if you were speaking with them face-to-face. Brief too, they didn't come in for a monologue.

A good rule of thumb for frequency: Imagine that you have a customer who is interested in what your company offers, and has given you permission to give them a call when you think something they might like comes up. How often would you call them? (For most of us, never more than once a week, much more like once a month or less).

Update [11/04/03] : some findings on frequency.

Show your customers the respect they deserve. Yes, the very respect with which you would like to be treated. Be a pioneer in honoring the trust your customers have placed in you. If you do this, sustainable, strong, and enviable business can follow.

Google tries to trump Amazon

Google, who is slated for one of the biggest and most anticipated IPO's in recent memory has decided they won't be outdone by Amazon's ability to search the text of their books.

There isn't a ton of info yet, but it's clear they are feeling threatened and are now on the offensive.

Dumb idiots

So get this:

The ____ for Dummies and the Idiots guide to ____ books have sold 120 million copies between them (100 mil for dummies, 20 mil for idiots). The "Dummies" series has 796 titles (69 new this year) and "Idiot's" has 450 titles (79 this year). Details...

This is just since 1991 when the first copy of "DOS for Dummies" was introduced.

I know I own a couple myself - and obviously I'm not alone.

The question is this: why do these books have such appeal? The answer isn't rocket science of course, it's because we like to have it spoon fed to us. We don't want to have to work real hard at "getting it." Plus many of us feel we missed the train when it went by, and everyone else hopped on. We want to catch up, and we want to do it fast.

This is perhaps the single biggest mistake most companies make when they create a website. It's just too darn hard to understand and use. And your visitors don't have the interest or time to work a learning curve just so you can communicate with them. It's your job to create understanding, not theirs.

It is critical that your site be designed for dummies. Strip it down, simplify it. Remove 50% of your copy, and then get rid of half of what is left. Put "click here" where people are supposed to click. Make everything obvious. (Your sophisticated users won't mind if your site is more obvious and clear to use, trust me). Don't try to do more than 1 or 2 things on any given page (even your home page).

If you start with this approach to web design I suspect you will be amazed at the response you get from visitors. I recently advised and helped a client implement a brain-dead simple solution to helping them present holiday shopping to their visitors. The day it launched sales spiked over 50% and have held solid for a month and counting.

While it won't bring traffic to your site, or improve your product - simplifying and (re)designing your site for dummies will make the money you spend getting visitors to your site, far less likely to be wasted money.

TV Advertising is dead

As Seth Godin prophesied in his book Purple Cow, TV Advertising is dead.

Now you must come up with a combination of a remarkable product/service that is easy to spread the word about. You must also facilitate that word spread - which is where word of mouse comes in.

Um - wow. Amazon lets you search inside books

So Amazon now lets you search the entire contents of over 120,000 books when doing a search. Wow.

X10 bites it

Can't say I'm sad to see trouble for a company that advertises at the expense of annoying and offending it's customers.

Fraud Fighting

Cool.

Outlook 2003 Rocks.

It's true Outlook 2003 (available this month) really does do a great job of blocking spam. It has a few other very nice features, but for those plagued by spam, this is the most nicest.

Net fraud and the truth

We talk periodically here about the latest online scams, and there are certainly some appropriate rules of conduct to observe, but it's also important to note that chances of falling victim to net fraud, particularly identity theft, are remote.


We need to get the facts straight about identity theft and the Internet and stop scaring consumers away from the antidote to a $47 billion national problem.
A consumer stands a greater chance of being struck by lightning than falling prey to identity theft after paying a bill online. In fact, individuals actually reduce their overall risk of identity theft when they participate in some online monetary transactions.